Go Local Guru Web Search

Search results

    3.17-0.03 (-0.94%)

    at Mon, Jun 3, 2024, 4:00PM EDT - U.S. markets closed

    After Hours 3.22 +0.05 (+1.68%)

    Delayed Quote

    • Open 3.24
    • High 3.24
    • Low 3.11
    • Prev. Close 3.20
    • 52 Wk. High 4.87
    • 52 Wk. Low 2.32
    • P/E N/A
    • Mkt. Cap 290.03M
  1. Results from the Go Local Guru Content Network
  2. New York Times Co. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v...

    U.S. Const. amend. New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on the First Amendment right to freedom of the press. The ruling made it possible for The New York Times and The Washington Post newspapers to publish the then- classified Pentagon Papers without risk of ...

  3. New York City Transit Authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_Transit...

    The New York City Transit Authority (also known as NYCTA, the TA, [2] or simply Transit, [3] and branded as MTA New York City Transit) is a public-benefit corporation in the U.S. state of New York that operates public transportation in New York City. Part of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the busiest and largest transit system in ...

  4. Metropolitan Transportation Authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan...

    Number of vehicles. 2,429 commuter rail cars. 6,418 subway cars. 61 SIR cars. 5,725 buses [1] The Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( MTA) is a public benefit corporation responsible for public transportation in the New York City metropolitan area of the U.S. state of New York.

  5. Associated Press v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Press_v._United...

    Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945), was a ruling of the United States Supreme Court. concerning both antitrust law and freedom of the press. The ruling confirmed that anticompetitive behavior in the news industry should be subjected to a First Amendment analysis on the ability of the public to receive information from multiple sources.

  6. V (New York City Subway service) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_(New_York_City_Subway...

    The V Sixth Avenue Local was a rapid transit service in the B Division of the New York City Subway. Its route emblem, or "bullet", was colored orange since it used the IND Sixth Avenue Line in Manhattan . The V operated weekdays only from approximately 6:30 a.m. to midnight between 71st Avenue in Forest Hills, Queens and Second Avenue, near the ...

  7. New York v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._United_States

    New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court.Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, writing for the majority, found that the federal government may not require states to “take title” to radioactive waste through the "Take Title" provision of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act, which the Court found to exceed Congress's power ...

  8. Dow Chemical Co. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Chemical_Co._v._United...

    Powell (concur Part III, dissent Parts I-II), joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun. Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. IV. Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1986 dealing with the right to privacy and advanced technology of aerial surveillance.

  9. United States v. Butler - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Butler

    United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 (1936), is a U.S. Supreme Court case that held that the U.S. Congress has not only the power to lay taxes to the level necessary to carry out its other powers enumerated in Article I of the U.S. Constitution, but also a broad authority to tax and spend for the "general welfare" of the United States. [1] The ...

  10. United States v. Arthrex, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Arthrex,_Inc.

    Dissent. Thomas, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (Parts I and II) United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution as it related to patent judges on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In a complex decision, the Court ruled ...

  11. Montana v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_v._United_States

    Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981), was a Supreme Court case that addressed two issues: (1) Whether the title of the Big Horn Riverbed rested with the United States, in trust for the Crow Tribe or passed to the State of Montana upon becoming a state and (2) Whether Crow Tribe retained the power to regulate hunting and fishing on tribal lands owned in fee-simple by a non-tribal member.